söndag 11 oktober 2015

Theme 5 - reflection post

This week had a different setup compared to the other weeks, instead of having one lecture and one seminar we had two lectures. The two lectures differed quite a bit, the first one was in my opinion the better one, it felt more prepared and had a structure. The second one I think would have been better if was in a different setting, like a seminar. Because it was a very interesting person who held the lecture, but since he did not know that he was about to have this lecture it become pretty messy and confusing at times.


Part one:
Habio Li had the fist lecture and it was about the process and the five steps from getting an idea to selling it.

Step one: How to come up with an idea?
There are many problems that we have to day, what you need to do is to define one problem. It is when you have done that you can move on to find the idea of a solution. Li explained that if you spend 90% of you effort in defining the problem and 10% on solving it you will find a much better solution than you would if you spent your time the opposite.

Step two: How to filter the idea?
If you get more than one good idea, how should you choose the one? One way is to ask you questions like:
-       - Does the solution address the pain point of the problem?
-       - Can I do it, with the knowledge and the existing technology?
Li also talked about finding the billion-dollar idea, you should think of if you can make any money of you idea. I am a bit conflicted to that statement, for me personally I am not doing it the money and I think if you are I could lead that you never will be satisfied. I think that there are many great ideas even though you won´t earn billions of dollars of it. But I am not naïve, money is a important factor so I do agree that it is a important to consider.

Step three: How to validate a good idea?
Proof of concept, you should be able to see how the solution will help with the problem. By doing this being able to see its feasibility.

Step four: Evaluate the idea.
Make a prototype of the idea so that you can let others try it and give their view of it. By doing this you idea can develop into something even better. You can make sure that other people will understand how to use it and understand the purpose of it.

Step five: Marketing, selling the idea.
By now you understand the value of your idea but now you have to make sure that potential investors understand it too. 

Overall I think it gave a good idea of how the workflow can look like and I think Li made a good point with explaining the importance potting effort in understanding the problem first. If you do that the rest of the steps will be easier.



Part two:
During the lecture we talked about prototypes and if it can be seen as a research tool.  And the answer is yes, but it is one part of the method, which also contains research question, design and analysis.

Research method:
"Interviews is a stupid way to gain knowledge I you don´t do anything with it". 
So the importance is to have a good analysis of what you get from the interviews.


In the study of Anders Lundström the process was the imperial data – experimental design together with a small analysis (stat of the art) and interviews.

11 kommentarer:

  1. Hello Lisa, a most stunning reflection! I agree that Haibo Li's lecture was the one that was most fruitful for this weeks material. I think it was interesting and refreshing that he approached the problem from a technical point of view rather than a philosophical. I wish he would have focused more on discussing how to come up with an idea though since most of his lecture was based on already having ideas which was difficult to connect with for me.

    SvaraRadera
  2. Dear Lisa,
    I found that the two lectures handled two different takes on design research: Li's lecture that talked about research in a bigger scope and Lundström's lecture that had a more narrow scope - which helped a lot with discussing details, such as prototypes, of design research. I felt that Lundström's lecture could have been more clear, even though it was kind of improvised and I feel that I almost had more question marks raised to design research after the lectures. Though I agree with you that Haibo's lecture was a good reminder of the importance of thinking of the problem rather than the solution!

    SvaraRadera
  3. Hi,
    I agree with your opinion in step two. I also didn’t like the categorization of the ideas in great ideas, big ideas and innovative ideas according to the amount of money that you gain through this idea. As you said money are important, but I don’t think that money should be our motivation when we want to come up with an idea or to create something. Also, there s a possibly for a great idea never to gain the fame and the money it deserves. In addition, it doesn’t mean that every idea that gains a lot of money is a great one. But maybe this also depends on our personal opinion about what we consider as a great idea.

    SvaraRadera
  4. This was a good summary of the main points of both lectures. I agree that having the ambition of getting a billion dollar idea probably will leave you unsatisfied. There are many little ideas to be had, that make incremental improvements. Those are probably the ones we’ll work on and that will be enough for me. I’m also not sure what Haibo Li meant by that part of the lecture – I don’t think his point really was that we should have that ambition after all.

    SvaraRadera
  5. Hi Lisa!
    Such a thorough reflection you have written. You have really managed to point out the most important parts and the point of lectures. I myself had a bit difficulties understanding the second lecture. I liked what you wrote on the money aspect of coming up with an idea. I agree, although I can also see a person building something only based on personal interests and never reaching that feeling of complete satisfaction. Sometimes when you like something too much you put so much effort in it that you always want to keep improving it. Would you agree on that? Maybe a good way to avoid such situation are working in project groups with defined deadlines.
    Good work mate!

    SvaraRadera
  6. Hi Lisa~
    Your reflection is really awesome especially the conclusion for every step of handling the idea successfully. I am interested in finding the billion-dollar idea. My understanding of that is that billion-dollor is a metaphor to explain that the idea should be valuable and meaningful but not regarded as a way to earn money.
    Nice job!

    SvaraRadera
  7. Den här kommentaren har tagits bort av skribenten.

    SvaraRadera
  8. Hi,

    Good reflection, especially on the first lecture. I agree with you that interviews are useless, if they are just collected as they are and not further "processed". So it's important to analyze them and then articulate the results in reports. The sole interpretation is worth more than anything else, and drives the research forward. I also found it interesting, that apparently the "process" was the empirical data in Lundströms' paper. Coming from a strictly statistical setting, I am not used to this type of "method".

    SvaraRadera
  9. Hello Lisa,

    I LOVE the structure of your summary on Haibos lecture, very clear and super easy to follow! On step two (filter the idea) you bring up the money-aspect of doing research. I guess that this becomes more important when if you are actually working as a researcher. During our bachelors thesis (which was the closest we have come to strict scientific research) I don't think anyone thought about finding a billion dollar idea but rather something that is interesting.

    Do you think we have applied Haibos steps previously in our education? Would you say that these steps only applies to design research or is it also research in general?

    Cheers!

    SvaraRadera
  10. Thank you Rickard for your excellent questions, now when you mention it I come to think of the course we had "reflekterande design process". We had to come up with a great solution for the future, but again is was not about the money.
    And I do think that the steps Li mentioned apply better for design research when you want to find a product of some sort but I am not sure.

    - great discussion question! Thank you :)

    SvaraRadera
    Svar
    1. Thank you Lisa for you reflective answer!

      In the course "reflekterande designprocess" I think we spent a lot of the time defining the problem and less time solving it than we did in a lot of other courses! In the MDI course (Människa Datorinteraktion) we also developed a prototype and I felt like there was a big focus on being able to sell your idea. If i remember correctly we had corporate representatives present at the final presentation! Maybe if we combine different aspects of our previous courses we will arrive at what is (according to Haibo) correct design research but I don't think we have been doing it completely right from the beginning in some course.

      Keep up the good work!

      Radera